Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[CLOSED PR] Space Law rewrite
#3
Quote:The lines about Grand theft, theft and B&E in protected areas lists that ONLY the armory, ai upload and ai core are considered protected areas. The book is meant to be used as a set of loose guidelines and i'm not sure about making these specific zones the de facto 'protected' ones to be looked after. Arguments could be made for head offices and other zones such as security, but since this might differ from person to person and depends on situation i'd personally remove the line entirely.

Bridge, Security, and head offices are included in normal theft part about normal theft (sensitive areas). I just find that as is, breaking in into the Armory or AI upload is getting punished much more harshly (mainly due to the fact that when someone breaks in there, they are likely going on a rampage).

Quote:I am personally a bit unsure about this one, as it appears to be confusing. First, the way it is worded makes it seem like this punishment should be applied directly after a first offense if the criminal proves to not be part of NT. I assume that this is meant for changelings, vampires and otherwise. The inclusion of the following entry stating that capital punishment is to be considered on repeat offenses also, in my opinion, makes this line redundant. I also do not see why only exile should be considered in such a case.

This is mostly intended for Salvagers, wizards and "Diplomatic traitors" with the syndicate command armor, since technically vampires and the such are still employed in NT (which is why in the addenum I wrote humanoid and not human). It's to encourage people to not let Salvagers feast on the station, which happens rather often sadly, and space / dinner them to let them regroup on the maggpie (or wizard shuttle, etc), in contrast of instantly killing them. Perhaps it might be best to rephrase it to make it clearer.

Quote:Lastly, the addition of a small closing blurb would be cool for immersion and could serve as a way to sneak in a joke or two to lighten the mood after the overall serious wording.
Agreed, will think about something.

Thanks for the feedback!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[CLOSED PR] Space Law rewrite - by github_bot - 06-26-2023, 02:39 AM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by Bartimeus - 06-26-2023, 03:24 AM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by Chatauscours - 06-26-2023, 04:28 AM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by Silent Majority - 06-26-2023, 09:43 AM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by Chatauscours - 06-30-2023, 12:24 PM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by KikiMofo - 07-05-2023, 12:19 PM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by mralexs - 07-05-2023, 04:31 PM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by Frank_Stein - 07-07-2023, 04:24 AM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by Kotlol - 07-06-2023, 04:38 AM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by mintyphresh - 07-06-2023, 08:34 AM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by LeahTheTech - 07-24-2023, 11:15 PM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by Chatauscours - 08-09-2023, 10:45 PM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by Sord213 - 09-15-2023, 06:30 AM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by Katzen - 09-18-2023, 02:59 AM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by Cherman0 - 09-18-2023, 07:03 AM
RE: [PR] Space Law rewrite - by Chatauscours - 09-18-2023, 08:53 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)