Thread Rating:
  • 5 Vote(s) - 2.4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Portapuke too stronk
#13
(04-29-2023, 09:59 AM)Kotlol Wrote: So let me get this straight... The port-a-puke isn't too strong....
It's port-a-puke + other traitor items wich only SPIEFs can get...

Let me think of a common complaint of Classic.
"People hack open doors even when they aren't antags.. it's just classic culture, don't change it" - Paraphrazing
"HoPs give AA or else Staffies will jump over the desk and beat up the HoP to get AA" - Paraphrazing
"Staffies always break into EVA, who cares if they do?" - Paraphrazing.
"Doctoring on classic is hard since people rather take a mender and buzz off" - Yep more paraphrazing.

So why do spief's get away with it? Cause every regular player already opens the goddamn doors for them.
So basicly put...
The port-a-puke as a traitor only item ain't bad.
It's a problem as a spief item.
Deringers can take out Security members? (I don't know how that works... deringers are surprisingly bad... questioning secuirty and stun weapons run out faster then you think?)
And it happens OFTEN cause Port-a-puke is always in rotation with a wrestling belt?

...So not only does it seem like A RARE SITUATION happens A LOT for some reason acording to your claims.
But also no one stop spiefs on the servers that gets ACCUSED you get validhunting so much as you look wrong...
In a server where doctors can't do their jobs and staffies will break open doors and harras HoPs for AA.

At that point I am asking.. is Port-a-puke a problem.. or is something else the real problem?

i dont really see your argument and it seems like you are just saying that the reason a combination of antag gear is powerful is because of the server culture on classic. if im wrong feel free to correct me but thats just what i gathered from this post.


edit: also derringers are pretty powerful and you can just recharge stun gear at mining cargo or security if you have an adequate disguise
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Portapuke too stronk - by Mouse - 04-28-2023, 07:14 AM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Jakson - 04-28-2023, 09:51 AM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Lord_earthfire - 04-28-2023, 10:29 AM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Kotlol - 04-28-2023, 01:25 PM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Lord_earthfire - 04-28-2023, 07:33 PM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Kotlol - 04-29-2023, 06:03 AM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Mouse - 04-29-2023, 07:57 AM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Kotlol - 04-29-2023, 09:59 AM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by jckrfc03 - 04-29-2023, 10:16 AM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by nefarious6th - 04-29-2023, 01:10 PM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Kotlol - 04-29-2023, 02:24 PM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Jakson - 04-29-2023, 02:29 PM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Lord_earthfire - 05-01-2023, 08:33 PM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Kotlol - 05-02-2023, 03:23 AM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by StaringGasMask - 05-04-2023, 02:41 PM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Lord_earthfire - 05-02-2023, 04:05 AM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Kotlol - 05-05-2023, 05:13 AM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by babayetu83 - 05-05-2023, 10:54 AM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Jakson - 05-05-2023, 05:01 PM
RE: Portapuke too stronk - by Kotlol - 05-06-2023, 05:40 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)