09-30-2013, 01:48 PM
popecrunch Wrote:My 1/50 of a buck: Huk acted fine and I would have done the exact same thing. I don't really think the rule needs to be clarified since the intent is pretty clear, and over-specializing the rules gives ammunition to rules lawyers and loophole hunters.
But poopcrunch, the Asimov laws of robotics are written specifically FOR loophole hunters. He made them super ambiguous so it would create drama within his stories.
I don't exactly agree with what this dude did and I think Huk X 3 was right to gib him, and I myself would have given him a dayban once he started crying about getting gibbed. Just my .10