Goonhub
09-18-2013, 03:45 AM
For what it's worth, I think this should be an appeal. Did you make this an admin complaint so you could get other people to post their interpretation of the laws?
This case seems clear to me. He obviously didn't directly injure Brick. He didn't cause him to come to harm - being in space naked caused the harm. If he had caused Brick to be in space naked, he would have been breaking his laws.
What constitutes "contributing to harm" that isn't covered by "causing harm?"
This case seems clear to me. He obviously didn't directly injure Brick. He didn't cause him to come to harm - being in space naked caused the harm. If he had caused Brick to be in space naked, he would have been breaking his laws.
TheRedScare Wrote:Its true you aren't directly causing it but you are still contributing to his harm.
What constitutes "contributing to harm" that isn't covered by "causing harm?"