04-08-2022, 06:21 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-08-2022, 06:28 AM by Cal. Edited 5 times in total.)
I think you are severely overthinking the design of a cool armor vest and working around the obvious conclusion.
No, the people playing them do.
The obvious conclusion is that people that play the role validhunt. And that's fine, sometimes. Traitors ARE valid. But also being trusted by the community to play that role should temper you into playing it a little bit more nicely to obviously newer antagonists.
I mean a helmets a helmet. Security officers wear a helmet that covers their eyes and an armored vest, along with a bright red uniform with a description implying security officers beat people bloody.
You think they're aggressive and shouldn't be talked to as well?
(04-08-2022, 02:04 AM)Ikea Wrote: there is a reason why ntso gets an above average amount of complaints about validhunting compared to hos, because currently the roles look signals to everyone that it is that.
No, the people playing them do.
The obvious conclusion is that people that play the role validhunt. And that's fine, sometimes. Traitors ARE valid. But also being trusted by the community to play that role should temper you into playing it a little bit more nicely to obviously newer antagonists.
I mean a helmets a helmet. Security officers wear a helmet that covers their eyes and an armored vest, along with a bright red uniform with a description implying security officers beat people bloody.
You think they're aggressive and shouldn't be talked to as well?