Goonhub
03-22-2022, 08:02 PM
Re; blatantly helping **harmful, murderous** antags
The issues range deeper, what if someone is helping an antags who has attacked but not killed but claims to be “friendly and peaceful”. The definition of valid is always strange to me, the best way I’ve heard it described is “when someone is without a reasonable doubt possessing antag status (par special cases: cluwne)”, however when people defend visible valids (wizards) because they claim to be wizards and haven’t seen them commit a crime, it leads to me being very confused. I’ve had this happen with a doctor, but also security has defended them from me.
I won’t lie, I am a valid hunter as I play hard for whatever team I’m assigned to, but when sec saves a visible antag (I don’t harm new players) from me, it just doesn’t feel right for them to be healed up, patted on the back, and let free to wreak havoc again while I am brigged.
The issues range deeper, what if someone is helping an antags who has attacked but not killed but claims to be “friendly and peaceful”. The definition of valid is always strange to me, the best way I’ve heard it described is “when someone is without a reasonable doubt possessing antag status (par special cases: cluwne)”, however when people defend visible valids (wizards) because they claim to be wizards and haven’t seen them commit a crime, it leads to me being very confused. I’ve had this happen with a doctor, but also security has defended them from me.
I won’t lie, I am a valid hunter as I play hard for whatever team I’m assigned to, but when sec saves a visible antag (I don’t harm new players) from me, it just doesn’t feel right for them to be healed up, patted on the back, and let free to wreak havoc again while I am brigged.