Goonhub
03-03-2022, 04:04 AM
"i do not appreciate your attempts at character assassination"
I'm sure you do not appreciate this post at all. You still held me accountable for you getting what day it was mixed up. I did caveat my statement with "The only explanations that I can think of" - perhaps you would like to offer an alternative explanation as to why you blamed me for getting what day it is mixed up?
" you sure have a lot of strong words for someone who has, in this very thread, come out with multiple "this is absolutely what happened" anecdotes that turned out to not, in fact, happen, and then doubled/tripled/quadupled down on it in the face of absolute, undeniable evidence, while providing none of your own other than how you are absolutely sure you are right"
I provided evidence of the massive time gap between your dialogue and what you claim is my response. Also I was sober when all this went down so I trust my recollection a lot more than yours. Either way it still does not detract from everything else. Lets drop the stuff about the label as Mordent suggested.
" thus we are forced to assess zamujasa's statement a rating of 173 Pinocchio's. "
Nobody is being forced to do anything here and the maturity of that sentence! Also did you just say that your own statement has a rating of '173 Pinocchio's'? You do realize that reads like you just called yourself a liar? I'm not sure what to make of that, given the context of this thread I doubt anyone would be surprised if you called me a liar but thats not what you wrote. And who (except Kanye West maybe?) refers to themself in 3rd person like that? just odd.
You might try claim it was intended to be sarcasm but considering the seriousness of this conversation and the fact that sarcasm is generally viewed negatively as a maladaptive coping mechanism for covertly expressing hostility and contempt I'd suggest that might not be the best approach. Also you yourself are the subject, I'd expect it to be aimed at me if that actually was the case. If it wasn't sarcasm then somehow you managed to get you and me mixed up?!!!!!!!!! wat.png
Could you please explain what you intended to convey with that sentence cause its utterly baffling.
Still no acknowledgement of breaking admin guidelines etc either.
"we all know"
Fine. Anyone who has been around on goonstation a while. Funny how you focused on who knows rather than whether its true. Interesting priority.
I'm sure you do not appreciate this post at all. You still held me accountable for you getting what day it was mixed up. I did caveat my statement with "The only explanations that I can think of" - perhaps you would like to offer an alternative explanation as to why you blamed me for getting what day it is mixed up?
" you sure have a lot of strong words for someone who has, in this very thread, come out with multiple "this is absolutely what happened" anecdotes that turned out to not, in fact, happen, and then doubled/tripled/quadupled down on it in the face of absolute, undeniable evidence, while providing none of your own other than how you are absolutely sure you are right"
I provided evidence of the massive time gap between your dialogue and what you claim is my response. Also I was sober when all this went down so I trust my recollection a lot more than yours. Either way it still does not detract from everything else. Lets drop the stuff about the label as Mordent suggested.
" thus we are forced to assess zamujasa's statement a rating of 173 Pinocchio's. "
Nobody is being forced to do anything here and the maturity of that sentence! Also did you just say that your own statement has a rating of '173 Pinocchio's'? You do realize that reads like you just called yourself a liar? I'm not sure what to make of that, given the context of this thread I doubt anyone would be surprised if you called me a liar but thats not what you wrote. And who (except Kanye West maybe?) refers to themself in 3rd person like that? just odd.
You might try claim it was intended to be sarcasm but considering the seriousness of this conversation and the fact that sarcasm is generally viewed negatively as a maladaptive coping mechanism for covertly expressing hostility and contempt I'd suggest that might not be the best approach. Also you yourself are the subject, I'd expect it to be aimed at me if that actually was the case. If it wasn't sarcasm then somehow you managed to get you and me mixed up?!!!!!!!!! wat.png
Could you please explain what you intended to convey with that sentence cause its utterly baffling.
Still no acknowledgement of breaking admin guidelines etc either.
"we all know"
Fine. Anyone who has been around on goonstation a while. Funny how you focused on who knows rather than whether its true. Interesting priority.