08-04-2021, 09:07 AM
(08-03-2021, 09:05 PM)Cyberjamus Wrote:(08-03-2021, 03:44 PM)Vocalpocal Wrote: Last time I checked it was extremely slow and inefficient compared to just making it by hand. By slow I mean it having very long output code, like when you use only increments, but I might be wrong
does the length of the code change how long it takes the compiler to finish? because if not then it should be fine, because honestly i learned the code, but it can be tedious, one mistake and the rest of the code is messed up and its hard to skim through the code which the chemi assembler makes easier.
the chemicomp processes up to 30 characters every 0.4 seconds, stopping if it hits an operation. so long as your code isnt too messy it'll always be performing 2.5 transfers/heats every second, or adding 75 to a register (which youd only ever do with a heating operation)