06-05-2021, 03:52 PM
While I understand and concede, it's nice to have transparency and discussion, I find it befitting to endow the Development team with the trust they're owed.
They were chosen and allowed to be among the Devs because presumably they're skilled, well-reported upon and overall trustworthy.
In that regard, they should continue to be entrusted with the responsibilities and advantages that come with being a Developer.
If a change really is that noticeably bad, it can just as easily be tweaked or removed altogether.
I will add, I feel your point of making drunkenness a painkiller or provide damage reduction as opposed to outright deflection has merit.
Wouldn't it be fine to simply suggest this to the Dev who made the change as opposed to feeling left out of the decision making process?
They were chosen and allowed to be among the Devs because presumably they're skilled, well-reported upon and overall trustworthy.
In that regard, they should continue to be entrusted with the responsibilities and advantages that come with being a Developer.
If a change really is that noticeably bad, it can just as easily be tweaked or removed altogether.
I will add, I feel your point of making drunkenness a painkiller or provide damage reduction as opposed to outright deflection has merit.
Wouldn't it be fine to simply suggest this to the Dev who made the change as opposed to feeling left out of the decision making process?