Door hacking Nerf

[Sundance]

Ive had a bit to think about this and I think palis idea is the most fair because compare manual door hacking with packet nerd door hacking. I dont think making packet nerdery better than the manual way is a good idea. I do agree with a timer like almost everything else has now a days though.

I had a feeling this thread would be divisive. 

I need to point out that the recent PR would make packet nerd hacking a bit harder, so that is something to consider when comparing the two.

I also really disagree that this would make manual door hacking "harder" in any way. 
Again, this only randomizes the positioning, not the colors. In no way is that harder, it just requires you to learn the color(s) or simply learn one color - which wire controls the test light instead of brute forcing it via muscle memory. To compare that with packet nerdery which only a select few players bother to learn is a bit ... eh???? huhhh???

I don't have any disagreement with Pali's suggestion, but I wouldn't like adding an arbitrary timer to things to slow things down when a more engaging route could be taken, but i'm open to it.

That said, a middle-ground could be found here, where instead of the randomization, you have Pali's suggestion combined with making the bridge and security on seperate functions (i.e: point 2 on the OP).

I'd argue take the Security and Command door hacking to a deeper level and have them be harder to hack. Not exactly sure how to be honest, but i'd like if breaking into the bridge or sec was a little bit more complex. Maybe you have to have another tool to pull off a plate from it, or maybe shocking it will cause it to bolt automatically?

To be frank - I think Security and Command being on seperate wire functions is good enough as it requires players to learn the wire for those doors, which would be a rather slowing process in itself. It's outside the scope of this suggestion, but I suppose you could add an "alert" wire which PDA messages security / command if pulsed?