04-16-2020, 03:43 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-16-2020, 03:48 PM by UrsulaMejor. Edited 5 times in total.)
I think that your example, sundance, is something I think should be brought to admin attention. I don't think there is such a thing as a civil discussion that has one party othering or generalizing people over their identity like that.
Civility is for discussing budgets and taxes and economics, not the validity of someone's gender/sexual/ethnic/racial identity. I wouldn't personally start a big fight over it, but deff get the admin team involved asap if that kind of thing comes up
I agree with the overall sentiment, but not with your example.
Civility is for discussing budgets and taxes and economics, not the validity of someone's gender/sexual/ethnic/racial identity. I wouldn't personally start a big fight over it, but deff get the admin team involved asap if that kind of thing comes up
I agree with the overall sentiment, but not with your example.