Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Changes to glove fingerprinting
#14
(11-01-2017, 08:29 PM)Frank_Stein Wrote: If anything, maybe we should think about eliminating redundancy with the forensic scanner.

Why do we have to scan something to get a code, then use the scanner in hand to open a prompt, copy and paste the previous code, and then get a new message of who it belongs to. Why not just have a hyperlink in the code that tells you the other, or automatically include that info?

So, something along the lines of this?:

Forensic analysis of Black Gloves

Isolated fingerprints:
45f879bc1f036e99997c5c1b3c803bd9 Urist McGreytide Add Note: Something something important note

Isolated blood samples:
Unable to locate any blood traces.

Material analysis: nvpe7ue1r3 (black leather fibers) Add Note: Something something important glove ID note
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Changes to glove fingerprinting - by Hikurac - 10-31-2017, 01:16 PM
RE: Changes to glove fingerprinting - by Hikurac - 10-31-2017, 06:49 PM
RE: Changes to glove fingerprinting - by Hikurac - 10-31-2017, 10:15 PM
RE: Changes to glove fingerprinting - by cgrn10 - 10-31-2017, 10:35 PM
RE: Changes to glove fingerprinting - by Hikurac - 10-31-2017, 10:56 PM
RE: Changes to glove fingerprinting - by cgrn10 - 11-01-2017, 12:27 AM
RE: Changes to glove fingerprinting - by Hikurac - 11-01-2017, 04:10 PM
RE: Changes to glove fingerprinting - by Hikurac - 11-02-2017, 05:35 AM
RE: Changes to glove fingerprinting - by Hikurac - 11-02-2017, 05:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)