07-25-2017, 10:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-25-2017, 11:24 PM by Ed Venture. Edited 7 times in total.)
I don't really agree with removing a person when a new person goes to be apply for a HoS why should someone be removed when we don't have a set number rule for how many we can have? Again that just feels like a punishment for the sake of punishing and punishing someone for nothing is wrong. This whole discussion is starting to sound pointless to me. I feel the current system works and does not need changing after giving this more thought in the coming days since this topic started.
Really being a HoS is not about getting access to an E-Gun or the armory (I feel the weapons in the armory are useless anyway since the shotguns got nerfed) being an HoS means you proven yourself to the community and to the admins that you can play the role of Secuirty better than most and that you can be trusted with ordering all of security, teaching new players the role, rooting out shit security and dealing out harsh and sometimes lethal punishment to asshats while being inside the rules. Some say there are some abusing this trust right now and like I've said I have yet to see any proof of this. If that accusation is true then these people need to be removed from the role and if they are not then I guess admins are not doing their jobs that well regarding those players.
It also does not help that when people want to bring light to "Shit HoS Players" that they get shut down cause it's similar to an player complaint. Which is why I say record it if you see it. If you show you have what you feel is proof of the wrong doing from these players then at least you have something to bring to the table since your word seems to not be enough to get this person at the least on a watch list by the admins and at most removed from the role.
Really being a HoS is not about getting access to an E-Gun or the armory (I feel the weapons in the armory are useless anyway since the shotguns got nerfed) being an HoS means you proven yourself to the community and to the admins that you can play the role of Secuirty better than most and that you can be trusted with ordering all of security, teaching new players the role, rooting out shit security and dealing out harsh and sometimes lethal punishment to asshats while being inside the rules. Some say there are some abusing this trust right now and like I've said I have yet to see any proof of this. If that accusation is true then these people need to be removed from the role and if they are not then I guess admins are not doing their jobs that well regarding those players.
It also does not help that when people want to bring light to "Shit HoS Players" that they get shut down cause it's similar to an player complaint. Which is why I say record it if you see it. If you show you have what you feel is proof of the wrong doing from these players then at least you have something to bring to the table since your word seems to not be enough to get this person at the least on a watch list by the admins and at most removed from the role.