07-25-2017, 07:14 AM
I am strongly opposed to this. Head of Security's are supposed to not be shit, yes, and most mentors are not shit as they're supposed to be trusted to not Meta.
However, another thing that Head of Security's are supposed to be are Robust. Many Mentors I know are robust forces of nature, but if you're a Head of Security, you need to be more so. You need to know every single thing about the security layout, you need to know how to make on-the-point decisions, and you need to be able to be looked up upon. Head of Security's are in a way, the True Captain. If we just let every Mentor be one, then they're just the better Security officer.
However, another thing that Head of Security's are supposed to be are Robust. Many Mentors I know are robust forces of nature, but if you're a Head of Security, you need to be more so. You need to know every single thing about the security layout, you need to know how to make on-the-point decisions, and you need to be able to be looked up upon. Head of Security's are in a way, the True Captain. If we just let every Mentor be one, then they're just the better Security officer.