Why security can do not good

[Technature]

Stop derailing the thread. Please and thank you.

Let's move this conversation here instead.

So the general consensus from what I've seen is:

1.People trust a random staff assistant more than they trust security officers, who generally can't be antags without an antag making them one.  This often results in security death for simply doing their job because they trust that guy they arrested for shooting an officer.
2.No one seems to report actual crime, and the people that can stop it usually find out in ways that get them murdered and never brought back.
3.People outright antagonize security when they aren't antagonists, or even miscreants.  When given the choice between helping a dying security officer or running off, they choose a third option and proceed to beat them to death.

I know I'm not a super veteran with the security role, but it's kind of ridiculous when someone sides with an antagonist simply because I arrested them for causing problems earlier.

So I suppose the question is, how does one root out this problem and encourage people to trust security officers when they aren't on a power trip and being general shitlords?