Posts: 104
Threads: 35
Joined: Aug 2022
BYOND Username: Angelx3
Character Name: Norah Snow
Currently, you can get stabilized or even reinforced smes, and it will heavily counter an arcfiend, making you resistant or even immune to some of it's abilities. I am aware the gene was made rarer exactly because of this interaction, but I still believe it's silly that a gene can just hardcounter an antagonist this easily, with reinforced not even being able to be countered with mutadone.
By making it so only empowered smes can make you immune to arcfiends, it forces you to chose to sacrifice some stability to be able to get such immunity, and also makes it always able to be countered by mutadone, which makes it more fair as it's strange that a gene can so easily disable most of an antagonist abilities.
Posts: 120
Threads: 6
Joined: Sep 2022
BYOND Username: SupahSnowy
Character Name: Snowy Ironhart, Old Man Boney, Steven Slick, & Charlotte Willows
Agree, its an uncommon interaction but no gene should have the ability to invalidate an antagonist’s entire move set.
Posts: 284
Threads: 58
Joined: Oct 2024
BYOND Username: Rsod
Character Name: Red Jamiroquai
if removing non-empowered's effectiveness is off the table i want it to just be a temporary resistance - after a few strikes you lose your SMES gene, reinforced or not
but yes, i think empowering it should be neccessary at the very least to be on par against an arcfiend
Posts: 128
Threads: 13
Joined: Apr 2025
BYOND Username: GARGATHUGANOKTHEANNIHILATOR255
Character Name: moleman sam now and forever baby
(Yesterday, 12:29 PM)Snowy Wrote: Agree, its an uncommon interaction but no gene should have the ability to invalidate an antagonist’s entire move set.
to be fair it's easy enough to just take someone down with a toolbox. should they really have to rely on the crutch of their own abilities when regularly killing is that easy?
Posts: 39
Threads: 3
Joined: Nov 2022
BYOND Username: Asterion0
Character Name: Damian Lineman, Melody Lineworm, REV-R3nd
(Yesterday, 09:00 PM)GARGATHUGANOKSREVENG Wrote: (Yesterday, 12:29 PM)Snowy Wrote: Agree, its an uncommon interaction but no gene should have the ability to invalidate an antagonist’s entire move set.
to be fair it's easy enough to just take someone down with a toolbox. should they really have to rely on the crutch of their own abilities when regularly killing is that easy?
Relying on the 'crutch' of your abilities is the main point of nonhuman antags in the same way traitors, nukies, and spiefs have to rely on the 'crutch' of their exclusive items. It would be equally as silly if there was a super rare QM req called 'C-saber armor' that was normal armor and completely prevented all C-saber damage!
Especially if you consider that distributing stabilized SMES human is VERY easy as geneticist, and at least some crew are going to grab it, even if it's not a lot. And as you've said, that one staffie is now on equal grounds with the Arcfiend, with the backfup of both security and a medbay not hostile to them to fallback to (which the Arcfiend especially is unlikely to have, as their 'optimal' gameplan is punching Genetics APC, and hacking medbay's vendors for mutadone)
Posts: 148
Threads: 5
Joined: Dec 2021
BYOND Username: glowbold
Character Name: radine, nikita
I dislike flat blanket immunities in general. What if the SMES gene "shorted out" after you would have otherwise been shocked, and then recharges for a short period of time. It'd still be good to get in general and against arcfiends, but it won't brick-wall them the same way it does now.
Posts: 270
Threads: 16
Joined: Nov 2022
BYOND Username: Emikamiyuki49
Character Name: Jasmine Zhang, Emilia Lettuce
Been said on discord. SMES feels like if you can copy chaplain training to everyone in regards to arcfiend. It should be at least empowered rather than 100% nulifying arc powers on regular smes. Regular smes should decrease the damage just not 100%
Posts: 128
Threads: 13
Joined: Apr 2025
BYOND Username: GARGATHUGANOKTHEANNIHILATOR255
Character Name: moleman sam now and forever baby
Yesterday, 11:31 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 11:35 PM by GARGATHUGANOKSREVENG. Edited 1 time in total.)
(Yesterday, 10:10 PM)Asterion0 Wrote: It would be equally as silly if there was a super rare QM req called 'C-saber armor' that was normal armor and completely prevented all C-saber damage!
well, now they HAVE to add the 0.01% chance for c-saber armor to appear as a req reward
(Yesterday, 10:34 PM)glowbold Wrote: What if the SMES gene "shorted out" after you would have otherwise been shocked, and then recharges for a short period of time
(Yesterday, 10:56 PM)Emimiyu Wrote: Regular smes should decrease the damage just not 100%
I like these suggestions better than flat-out nerfing SMES human against arcfiends though
Posts: 85
Threads: 3
Joined: Jan 2025
BYOND Username: Taylorstar
Character Name: Bobby Boudle
If standard SMES gave you the defibrilated status after taking a large enough shock (not like a small jolt from a machine or door) I think that would be a good tie in and would allow medical staff to potentially defibrillate SMES users with enough spam.
Posts: 39
Threads: 3
Joined: Nov 2022
BYOND Username: Asterion0
Character Name: Damian Lineman, Melody Lineworm, REV-R3nd
A 'shorted out' status effect would be cool, and having the main appeal of empowered SMES human being that you can't get shorted would be nice. Also maybe apply it to Arcfiend's inherent SMES human gene just so you don't have them suddenly vulnerable to other Arcfiends after a single hit (Although I think it's already empowered maybe?).
Also kinda gives a buff to the baton special if it counts as enough of a shock to temporarily short out the gene