• What advice would you give to other sec players?
  

• What was one of your favorite security moments?
  

• What improvements or changes do you think would benefit security players?
  

• Describe any differences in your playstyle when part of a full security team and when being the only security officer.
  

• This is short but important: you know your stuff. Watched an antag shift for the other side too and you're plenty competent as an officer or threat. So no worries there. 
  
• In general, though not HoS or security specific, I think you have a really nice habit of what I call "Talking aloud" an example being you'll mutter "that's strange" into the dark emote scratching your character's head when confused. It's little stuff, but it adds some nice colour to an RP round and give some nice subtle cues you're present and aware for people to engage with and reacting back even if you're not sure anyone's around. 
  
• In general a theme you seem to have while playing is that you'll work around obstacles most of the time. If someone isn't engaging. perhaps they're distracted or busy, you'll move down the chain to the next person without griping about it. That's a good attitude to have, as its always going to crop up and sometimes it's going to be in stressful situations. I'd try and really hold onto this, as being willing to refocus seems like a pretty important skill as a HoS player. There is gonna be times people have an initial reaction that's not great, and being able to let that slide off and react well is what's an good example for the HoS
  
• Another important general skill you in general seem to have is that you can remain "cool" in a stressful situation. This will contradict a later piece of feedback but I'll explain why I think this is your general behaviour and also draw attention to the fact you're capable of doing this. A good example was when you were actually an antag: You were very patient with what I call target-screening behaviour, someone wasn't quite following you were escalating and you took some extra time to escalate to make sure they got where you were going with it. This is harder than it sounds, especially when there was lots of people around who at any time could have come across you (and did later). I think for the HoS that'll probably help both for you understanding when to be a bit "blind" to antags doing their thing for round pacing, so keep that in mind when compared to feedback later. 
  
• Good general delegation: When the detective had forensics to do, you let them do it. When officers already were handling things, you stepped back. If an issue wasn't being covered by anyone else, you generally picked it up. All good stuff.
  

• To give you whatever the opposite of the "benefit of the doubt is", I'm going to credit you with something that might have been a coincidence, but actually to me seemed like a brief moment of genius that I appreciated: There was a health implant report of the captain's death after seeing an officer was at the bridge doors you: Jumped on the cameras. You used this first to note the captain's locker was open, which lead to unveiling of a clue, which is all good but here's the part I liked: When the HoS was in there alone, you for no IC reason jumped off the cameras and started paying a lot less attention to the situation
  

• At a time command was compromised you asked to grab the e-gun from the contraband locker, seemed to hear a NTSC command to pop it back but they promptly had to cryo. You held onto the gun at the time, all fine here I think personally. You clearly communicated to the team you still had it, and used it reasonably enough. Later, when reporting you had it to the HoS (which is still good) they ordered you to return it. You didn't for some time, remembering it much later though you actually came close by the RD later on and had multiple opportunities and quiet moment. Going the other way with the benefit here: this felt a little like you wanted to hold onto a really useful weapon as a pocket ace. I think the shift was a bit more challenging than normal, and I'm ultimately not saying this was a bad decision (and it's subjective, and you simply could have forgotten) but I would give feedback that it's important to remember that security is balanced around the tools it has and if a superior gives a command it's generally a good idea to make sure it's followed, because they might be thinking the same thing. I think this was a bit of a special case where it actually made enough sense, but keep it in mind. 
  
• Speaking of command being compromised, the team lost its HoS and the NTSC was not really functioning for irrelevant reasons. I feel you made a really good effort (and the rest of the team did) to collaborate and listen to each other well. I do think honestly you were all a bit shaken to lose your HoS so soon but there were some good examples here: You specifically called for an outline of facts and listened to them, there was a good rallying call for how to punish and antag issued by you, and you listened to a (very good point) about working with the acting captain to authorise that. It was all calmly done and without any snappiness. Good stuff. 
  
• On the flipside, you also seemed to sort of forget we -had- command staff still. You rallied well when other officers mentioned it and went with working with them, but there's going to be weird situations like this on some rounds so just mentioning it here. 
  
• A lot of times during the shift you kept demonstrating well you were willing to engage with the crew, there was an inspector's gimmick that was quite forward and at a difficult time but you did engage with it. There was also a moment you sort of blanked a scientist trying to get your attention but: It was also mere seconds before you were going to storm the bridge. I think that was reasonable demonstration of "Pay attention and engage with RP, but sometimes you have to prioritise" so all good there.
  
• I honestly think there's a few outside factors with this that are a bit lengthy to go over but i'll summarise for now: Changelings being a bit more dangerous and the HoS dying early and the NTSC not quite being there made you all what I'd call a little execution happy in my non-sec opinion. However, it's an opinion, you all took a vote on it, and cleared it with the RD in the end, so it's ultimately subjective. So I'm mostly just noting it here but also saying I think that just demonstrates people are going to have differing opinions on situations. 
  
• You did have an awkward experience with a hall monitor. It was a situation essentially mid antagonist chase. I think you knew you went a overboard and de-escalated it by apologising first and directly to them. Good. There's going to be times you screw up as HoS and will need to quickly recognise it and respond to it. Just really keep in mind that it's only going to be magnified as a HoS and how you feel you could cope with that without it getting to you
  

(05-29-2025, 02:01 AM)avanth Wrote: While I can't comment on their experience with teaching, leading, or anything of that myself due to the schedule that I have kept for a long while now preventing me from running into Ishmael much, I would like to share an experience I had with them that has led to a minor concern after mulling over it on and off a small bit over the last couple of days. The concern being that they might, currently, be a bit too hasty in their judgements and/or actions. This stems from an interaction I had as an NTSC in a changeling round. Instead of allowing medical silicons, and potentially a doctor (room was incredibly crowded at the time) operate to remove a headspider that had just lept into me, the path chosen was to shoot directly at me with lethals, and not just once but multiple times over the course of the next half a minute or so, and even as medical were trying to hastily operate to remove it on the spot. This could absolutely be a one off event, but it stuck out to me as a rather hastily made decision that attempted to prevented others from contributing, and stuck out as a concern as to how they might act in a larger role.