Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - Printable Version +- Goonstation Forums (https://forum.ss13.co) +-- Forum: Server Appeals (https://forum.ss13.co/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Applications (https://forum.ss13.co/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +---- Forum: Approved Applications (https://forum.ss13.co/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +---- Thread: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application (/showthread.php?tid=14773) |
Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - Mouse - 08-01-2020 Usual character name: Mouse Fitzgerald (in addition, I'm Tricky as a Clown, Mr. Chimpers as a Test Subject, and defective clown/defective mime as a Mime in case people have any positive or negative experiences with me under those names.) BYOND username: Cthucky Discord username (if you are on our discord): N/A, although I probably ought to join one of these days Recommended by (if applicable): N/A Goon servers you play: Goon2 or whatever it's called now. The one that isn't the roleplay server. Reason for application: Oh boy. In part, the reason I'm applying is the major reason I started playing security again - frustration with bad security officers and the feeling that I could help improve the situation by setting an example or talking with/dealing with officers who are being shitty. (I also figured that by taking a security slot I could potentially prevent someone who was going to take it to grief from being able to take it, but that's not really relevant to HoS.) Another reason, at least when I started contemplating applying, was that no HoSes were ever really on. I assume they just burned out. This was fine until the latest streamertide, where we suddenly got a whole bunch of new people on, including the inevitable "sign up as security first round and grief" people. The population was much higher, bad security was more common, and often I was the only remotely experienced officer on. At that point, I started considering applying for HoS not because I felt I was qualified (I felt I wasn't!) but because we needed HoSes on and, out of all the people who were regularly playing security, I had some of the most experience. The event that took me from just entertaining the idea to actually being serious about the application wasn't even when I was playing as security. I was a doctor. I called someone an idiot for cloning a puritan, in a moment of frustration and exasperation. It was not the right thing to do. After round end, the person mentioned it, I apologized, and they said that it particularly hurt because they respected me, or looked up to me, or something along those lines. It was then that I finally actually understood that hey, maybe playing a game nearly daily for well over a year gets people to remember who you are. And maybe, if you're not a dick, they remember you in a positive way. I know it seems kind of silly written out like that, but it really was something that just never clicked in my head. Also, I'm probably the only person to ever be told by an admin, while playing security, that I should have set the mime on fire earlier*. Security experience (300 word minimum): While I've been playing SS13 for a decent period of time (since January 2019), I haven't played as security for that whole time. I don't recall when I first turned it on (I remember I had detective on at least during the Ssethtide, but I'm not sure if I had secoff enabled at that point), but it was probably at least a month. Eventually I got tired of the responsibility and rolling it constantly and turned it (along with most roles, honestly) off. That was around late 2019 I believe. Eventually, as I mentioned before, I turned it back on at some point in 2020, I believe a bit after the release of Kondaru although I had been latejoining as security for a some time before actually enabling it in preferences again. That's what I remember best, so that's what I'm mostly going to talk about. Since turning it back on, I didn't really do much to distinguish myself at first. I don't think I was horrible, but I don't think I was really all that good. I was mostly just there. But we started getting HoS signups on fewer and fewer rounds, and I found myself the most senior security officer around more and more often. I found myself taking charge, giving orders to my fellow officers, stopping them when they were abusive, and trying to resolve conflicts between them and the crew. Sometimes the officers even listened. At times the captain or other heads would tell newer security officers to do something I didn't think security should have been doing, and I would vehemently tell everyone that no, we weren't arresting and executing this staffie for being rude. No, we're not authorizing the armory just so you can run around with cool guns. I found myself acting as the head of security, only without the access or the snazzy clothes. (except for that one round someone packet nerded the HoS locker open) As I got used to that, I started being the person who would take up the jacket and beret when he had an HoS but they suicided or ended up permadead. I was never quite sure I actually made them proud, but I asked a few times and they had no complaints at least. One thing I've tried to do consistently, even before my hiatus from all jobs with responsibility, is to apply the law fairly and reasonably. If I arrest someone with traitor gear, weapons and other dangerous things go into the confiscated items locker. Syndie donk pockets? Advanced thermals? You can get them back when you're released. As much as I'd like to carry around the donk pockets for myself, they aren't mine. In general, if an item is dangerous enough to be confiscated from a civilian, it's too dangerous for security to use unless it's absolutely necessary. I've tried to avoid lethal force when stunning and cuffing is an option, a decision that has cost me a few times. But honestly, I'd willing to die if it means I don't kill an innocent. Way I see it, if you want to play the hero then you actually have to play the hero. That doesn't mean I'm not willing to kill antags - I just try to keep it an option of last resort. If someone calls me "shitsec", I try to take a look at my behavior to see if I crossed a line. I even wrote an ahelp on myself once because, after some thinking, I decided I may have gone too far. The moment was a bit spoiled when I happened to ask what happened to that person right before I was going to hit submit and learned that they got gibsharked, but if it weren't for that idle curiosity I would have seriously ahelped myself. Answer two or more of the following:
Less tersely, it is incredibly important to talk to the crew and get to know them. If the crew doesn't trust you, you can't do your job effectively. If you don't trust the crew, then they're not going to trust you. That doesn't mean you should be stupid and just go with whatever you were told last, but don't automatically assume someone is evil. In general, it's a good idea to tailor your competence to the real or perceived competence of the antags. This isn't just advice to security, by the way, it's a good thing to keep in mind for everyone. There's a lot of ways to take someone down quickly and with few if any counters, but unless that's the only option left then you probably shouldn't use them. If you're dealing with an obviously new antag who just isn't that good but they're trying, damn it, feel free to be more merciful. Feel free to make a few mistakes to give them a bit of a chance. If someone is willing to put the effort into making a plausible excuse as to why they have contraband or are doing something antagonistic, then unless they're actively killing or maiming people it's polite to fall for it, at least at first. Even if you know for a fact their excuse is a lie. While not necessary, it's completely appropriate to be extra gullible when it comes to the clown, particularly if their excuse is creative and thoroughly implausible. While you don't have to be completely reactive (some antags, like nukies, blobs, and lings need to be confronted immediately due to how dangerous they can be, and some traitor items are dangerous enough that the only way you're taking someone who has them down is through mass casualties or getting the drop on them), it's perfectly appropriate to not immediately arrest someone for having visible traitor gear and instead wait for them to use it.
Also let us clip our badges to our exosuit so we can be recognizable as security if we decide to use the different jumpsuits/helmets
Answer one or more of the following fun questions (because it's important for the HoS to be fun):
I was gonna try to make the uniforms red but then I realized I had no artistic talent whatsoever. Previous bans (while this will not affect your application lying about it will): None. I've been Talked To by admins a few times, often for killing someone I thought was an antag who turned out not to be, and those should be considered as a mark against me. That said the only time I recall an admin talking to me over my behavior as a security officer was rapidly resolved in my favor and was certainly something. *I was not the one who set the mime on fire, damn it. That was the wizard. RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - Technature - 08-01-2020 Drawn picture is actually poorly edited previously drawn picture, never make HoS. Shame. In all seriousness, my memory isn't the best, but I think I remember mostly positive from the Mouse before I moved to the RP server. The App seems pretty solid as well. And I agree with...I dunno, 98% of it? (I take headsets if someone who has their headset is trying to get the crew to turn against security while they're in the brig. Not because it might work (if you're doing your job properly, it won't), but because it gets really annoying really quick, and no one wants to hear it. Give it back though of course.) Mentioning being talked to by the admins is unnecessary, but very transparent, and shouldn't be considered something against you as long as you learn from it. +1 from me. RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - Leeanei - 08-01-2020 I remember Mouse was a good secoff on top of being a helpful person in other realms. +1 taking headsets is wrong unless its someone screaming their head off and spamming the radio with really unneeded things. RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - Drago156 - 08-01-2020 I have personally seen Mouse grow as a better player and competent security officer since they started and I think they are more ready for HoS than they think they are. Seeing Mouse as sec is often a relief to me when I'm HoS and not when I'm antag, because I know Mouse is a good security officer who knows how to rope in the baddies and makes a solid sec. I say yes, beret this nerd. Since Tomatotide started main has seen a noticeable increase in pop and shitters, and having another person to keep things straight on the station with the ability to effectively lead a team and keep the station safe is definitely something I would say Goon needs now more than ever. +1 RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - RichardGere - 08-02-2020 Mouse is a good security officer and goon would be lesser without him. +1 RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - Caro - 08-02-2020 Mouse is a good fella and a good secoff, never had any negative interactions with him, and he always seemed to be a competent cop to me +1 RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - borkatator - 08-03-2020 Mouse is a good officer. I'm always happy to see him when I roll secoff. +1 RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - Tiggersaurus - 08-03-2020 Good security interactions from what I remember. Treats Borg well even when rogued. +1 they can has hat RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - pali6 - 08-03-2020 I'm the least qualified person when it comes to opinions on security but I'd trust Mouse with the beret. +1 RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - Rodney Dick - 08-05-2020 A good sec teammate and a delight to torment when a baddie - I'd definitely trust him to keep the squad in line. +1 RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - Salami Sam - 08-06-2020 Mouse is a reponsible and helpful officer. I've seen them helping other newer players during the recent influx. +1 RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - ptxnx - 08-06-2020 Playin sec recently has been a pretty tough gig and its a relief when mouse is there. Even if he gets real tilted sometimes RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - Jake4971 - 08-08-2020 (08-01-2020, 06:57 AM)Mouse Wrote: I called someone an idiot for cloning a puritan, in a moment of frustration and exasperation. It was not the right thing to do. After round end, the person mentioned it, I apologized, and they said that it particularly hurt because they respected me, or looked up to me, or something along those lines. I happen to be that doctor you called an idiot. To clarify, I used a Strange Reagent brew on a corpse that was already set to DNR (I genuinely didn't know at the time, but I brought back a few players on that same round with the same stuff) and made a mess at the cloner due to that. I can understand why my recklessness would frustrate you, and I even heard you consider suicide for the next round to atone for your pent of frustration which made my heart sink a bit. I didn't mean to return that kind of anger back at you. Regardless, I've seen you play officer a number of times through the general radio, and I clearly seen officers that were notably worse than you - ones that would actually fall for a false accusation, or ones that end up wasting time, yours and theirs. You're a lot better. You're a lot more serious on your job, and you take the position - and those around you to heart. I never had to be confronted by you since I usually play the "goodie-twoshoes doctor," but I've spectated you a handful of times when I couldn't dedicate a full round. It's a bit creepy, but you're one of the handful of people I can look up to, and I sometimes want to see perspectives of others. The most recent runup I can recall with you was in Donut 3, where you told me to take my helmet off to get rid of my unwanted mustache one time, which makes you considerate of others. I trust you'll make a good HoS. +1. RE: Cthucky/Mouse's HoS Application - Podrick Equus - 08-14-2020 An excellent application for an excellent officer. +1 |