Goonstation Forums
Trivial Stacked ore uses only one slot in a mining satchel - Printable Version

+- Goonstation Forums (https://forum.ss13.co)
+-- Forum: Discussion (https://forum.ss13.co/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Bug Reports (https://forum.ss13.co/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Open Bugs (https://forum.ss13.co/forumdisplay.php?fid=22)
+---- Thread: Trivial Stacked ore uses only one slot in a mining satchel (/showthread.php?tid=10668)



Stacked ore uses only one slot in a mining satchel - Superlagg - 06-16-2018

Mining bags consider stacked ores to be one single item, no matter how much stuff is in that stack. Thus, you can carry effectively infinite amounts of ore in a satchel if you stack them neatly.

For instance, say you mined out a hundred pieces of molitz and mauxite. Normally, your bag'd fill up long before you picked it all up. But, stack it all up, and suddenly it all fits just fine.

Course, you can just stuff those stacked ores in your backpack, and having to dump and stack everything when the bag gets full can get tedious, and you'll need to unstack all those ores to process them (currently).


RE: Stacked ore uses only one slot in a mining satchel - MrMagolor - 06-17-2018

Well I mean how would this be fixed?

also I'm fine with this considering the only reason I use stacked ore is to separate other ores from miracle matter, among other things


RE: Stacked ore uses only one slot in a mining satchel - ZeWaka - 06-17-2018

(06-17-2018, 10:24 AM)MrMagolor Wrote: Well I mean how would this be fixed?

pretty easily, just account for .amount


RE: Stacked ore uses only one slot in a mining satchel - Frank_Stein - 06-17-2018

(06-17-2018, 10:24 AM)MrMagolor Wrote: Well I mean how would this be fixed?

You could probably account for the size of stacks and give bags a limit.

So 1 ore is 1 bag slot, and 20 stacked ores are 20 bag spots and so on and so forth


RE: Stacked ore uses only one slot in a mining satchel - MrMagolor - 06-17-2018

Considering how QM sales work fine with stacks, yeah, you could probably just peek at that code and work something out.